#1 Source for Leaks Around the World!

Archive for the ‘NWO’ Category

Flight 370: The Straw That Breaks the Cabal’s Back?

In Archive, Conspiracy, News, NWO, World Revolution on April 17, 2014 at 11:17 AM

By David Wilcock

Flight 370 could have become the most devastating terrorist attack in recorded history. Could this Boeing 777 — or one just like it — have been used to murder the leaders of the top 53 nations on Earth?

Why were 20 scientists with Cosmic Top Secret clearances on Flight 370 — and did some group feel it was absolutely necessary to stop them?

Did one of the passengers on Flight 370 successfully send out a message indicating he was being held on a “prison ship” near the biggest US/UK military base in the Indian Ocean — and that the other passengers were still alive?

The secret powers running the military-industrial complex, the Federal Reserve banking system and key Western nations — i.e. the Cabal or “Illuminati” — may have just tried to achieve the ultimate world coup. Thankfully, they failed.

Had their plan succeeded, it would have become the defining story of our time — and almost certainly would have started a world war.

Thankfully, the shadowy, elusive group that was likely responsible for this “botched job” may be on the brink of true defeat.

By not fearing them, and being brave enough to objectively examine the evidence, Flight 370 may well be the straw that breaks the Cabal’s back.

[Re-envisioned Cabal graphic by David Wilcock, divinecosmos.com]


You won’t find any cynical sarcasm, doom or hopelessness here. This is not “fear porn.” There’s already plenty of that.

This is a story of hope — where we “connect the dots” and suggest that we are now witnessing the defeat of the greatest villain of all time.

It is a complicated story, with a variety of astonishing twists and turns; and never in the least bit dull or boring.

A vast international alliance including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, or BRICS, is working to defeat the Cabal.

The sheer size of this investigation, and the number of graphics, has required that we break it into at least two parts. This is the first of those parts.

You will not only find clear and compelling evidence that such a Cabal exists. You will also learn about a vast international alliance that is working to defeat them.

So far, all of this has been happening behind the scenes, with certain headlines suggesting greater mysteries are at work. That may all soon change.

When the truth finally comes out, the last 300 years of world history — at least — may soon be viewed very differently than they are today; and we will have a much happier world.


Admittedly, it can be very upsetting to imagine a cabal of of power-hungry people who want to create a “New World Order” of total domination and control.

In case you think this is a “fringe” belief, relegated to “a few crazies on the internet,” think again.

Just one year ago, a whopping 28 percent of American voters — including 38 percent of Republicans – told an anonymous stranger on the phone that they believe there is a Cabal.

Specifically, they agreed that “Secretive power elite with a globalist agenda are conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or a New World Order.”



Since these results were in the sky-blue days of blissful ignorance before the NSA disclosures, we can easily assume these numbers have since doubled.

That would now mean that 56 percent of American voters and 76 percent of Republican voters believe a “secret power elite” are “conspiring to rule the world.”

The lesson here is obvious. According to the 2013 Census, there are 316 million, 128 thousand 839 people living in America today.

If these percentages hold true outside the voting public, then 88 million, 516 thousand and 74 Americans believed in the Cabal before the NSA disclosures ever emerged.

This is by no means a small group. 88.5 million Americans is a “critical mass.”

Once we consider how widespread these beliefs are outside the United States, we see that at least hundreds of millions, if not well over a billion people believe in a “secret power elite”.


92 percent of Americans told Gallup they believed in some form of God as of 2011. This is the vast majority, despite what skeptics often say.

The “eight percent” are very good at making it sound like everyone agrees with them — such as when they write scathing YouTube and Facebook comments.

How can anyone within the 92-percent majority blend the concept of a world-power-seeking Cabal into their existing spiritual beliefs?

When we start reading about these nefarious plots, it can seem as if there is no way out. We may have incredible fear, anxiety and even panic attacks.

However, there are far more people who believe in the Cabal than there are in the Cabal itself — including the employees they hired to spy on us.

Together, we are much bigger and tougher than this bully on the playground.

One of my favorite analogies is this: if 99 people are starving in a sealed room, and one person is sitting on a mountain of food, sooner or later he will be overthrown.

He can carry all the weapons he wants, but it’s still only a matter of time before the people will organize against him.


Sarah McLendon heard a rare confession of how strong — and feared — the public really is from a senior member of the Cabal in 1992.

Sarah was the “grand dame” of the White House press corps at the time — the doyenne, to enlist another SAT word to our noble cause.

Sarah McLendon was there at every White House press conference. She was very vocal, highly respected, and had interviewed every president since Eisenhower.

She had an aggressive manner of questioning that “made the veins stand out” on President Eisenhower’s head, as one example.

Here she is when she was already a well-established journalist, interviewing President John F. Kennedy:




I sat directly behind Sarah at the Disclosure Project Executive Summary Briefing for VIPs and Members of Congress on May 10, 2001 in Washington, DC.

Admittedly I knew what I was doing, as she was a legend — and I did get to have a nice conversation with her at such a momentous occasion.

This was also my first exposure to a large group of insiders who had worked for the government / military industrial complex in top-secret programs.

I had worked five years online to become a public figure — and managed to meet the majority of all the insiders who had come forward at this event.

The Disclosure Project was organized by Dr. Steven Greer, and pulled together 39 top whistleblowers prepared to testify before Congress about UFOs.

The Disclosure Project received generous coverage in the world media, as you can see on their website here — shortly after the event occurred.


I also appeared in Amardeep Kaleka’s 2013 documentary SIRIUS, covering this story. Greer confirmed my presence at the 2001 briefing in a radio show we did together.

The debut of SIRIUS remained at the top of the Most Popular list on Huffington Post for several days — due in no small part to the public shock of seeing the photo of a purported ET corpse.

I summarized the movie’s contents in an article I wrote after the premiere. The Cabal was brilliantly exposed in the movie.

The tiny humanoid was definitely biological.

DNA tests from leading expert Dr. Garry Nolan revealed it was humanlike, but was approximately 11 percent different from us.

Sarah McLendon knew there were many secrets — and that we were being lied to.

Without her political power, the Disclosure Project might never have made it to the National Press Club.


When I met Sarah at the Disclosure Project, she was in a wheelchair, but she was still full of vim and vigor; extremely upbeat and cheerful.

Here she is with former President Bill Clinton a few years before I met her.


Sarah established the bi-weekly McLendon News Service newsletter in 1946, as her 2003 obituary in The Guardian revealed:

History of the McLendon News Service

McLendon grew up in Tyler, Texas, and graduated from the local junior college before going on to the University of Missouri’s famous Pulitzer school of journalism.

She started work in 1931 for two papers in Tyler and one in Beaumont, Texas. In 1944 she moved to the Washington bureau of the Philadelphia Daily News.

Two years later she established her own news service for a whole string of small Texas papers, providing a biweekly Washington newsletter, full of political gossip and inside dope for papers that could not afford their own Washington correspondent.

She also offered a radio commentary, taken at its height by 1200 radio stations.


The McLendon News Service featured a June 1992 interview where she asked George H. W. Bush a riveting question:

“What will the people do if they ever find out the truth about Iraq-gate and Iran-Contra?”

Perhaps disarmed by her genteel Southern hospitality, Bush Senior’s now-infamous reply betrayed an astonishing moment of truth:

“Sarah, if the American people ever find out what we have done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us.”


Not everything printed in the McLendon News Service ended up in the newspapers — obviously. This quote certainly did not.

Lt. Commander Alexander Martin (almartinraw.com), who once testified in the Iran-Contra hearings, publicly revealed he read this quote in Sarah’s newsletter.

Martin told this story on Tom Valentine’s Radio Free America program when he was a guest on July 10, 1995.

Tom Valentine now writes for Veterans Today. Al Martin still maintains his website, Al Martin Raw.com.


I highly discourage this violent “lynch mob” mentality. It is the worst thing we could do.

Much of the Cabal is compartmentalized, meaning that lower-level members have no idea of what goes on at the top.

This was revealed by ex-NSA whistleblower Jim Stone in May 2012, who we will hear a lot more from later on.

Ex-NSA Whistleblower Jim Stone on Compartmentalization

There is something that I am sure most people do not realize when they talk about the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc.

And that is that these agencies have no people in them that are allowed to know what their work is really used for.

A tyrannical government will always seek out honest people and use them to do evil by restricting information from them….

[They only] see one small part of the total mission, and the reason given to them is so that one individual cannot see what is happening from start to finish and then sell out to the “enemy”.

Their field of knowledge is restricted to one small piece of the job, or “compartment”. This restriction of information is called compartmentalization….


So again, to label many thousands of people as “Illuminati” and demand instant, vigilante justice is another form of mass atrocity — and should be avoided.

The Cabal knows the public is much stronger than they are.

I am only sharing Bush’s “lynching” quote here to suggest that the Cabal knows the public is much stronger than they are — once the truth breaks out.

Some insiders have told me the Cabal has had long-standing plans in place to flee, in massive numbers, at the first sign that everything has broken open.

What might the “truth about Iraq-gate” have been that George H.W. Bush was so concerned about?

Lt. Commander Al Martin may have found an answer — as what the Bush Administration planned to do in the 2003 war was even worse than first one.


Lt. Commander Al Martin was leaking a great deal of high-quality classified intel when I was actively reading his site in the late 1990s / early 2000s.

In 2003, Martin’s sources revealed that the Cabal sent in a CIA team to plant WMDs in Iraq — right where Donald Rumsfeld said they would be found.

Bush and Rumsfeld Quotes on WMDs in Iraq

“Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.”
– George W. Bush, January 28, 2003

“We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad.”
- Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003


If these weapons had been found, we may well have had “World War III in the Middle East” — and ended up on a very different timeline.

According to Martin’s sources, the 100-person CIA team tasked with planting these deadly materials was killed in a friendly-fire “fragging” incident.

The soldiers who attacked them apparently had no idea what their full mission entailed — or at least they had not been briefed about it.

The CIA agents who were about to plant the WMDs were killed, or deserted, after Army soldiers were alerted to another one of their plans.

The agents were also there to rob Iraqi banks, museums and Saddam’s royal palaces of all of their riches after the 2003 Iraq invasion.

This story was bravely covered by the Daily Times Monitor, a mainstream media outlet in Pakistan, on August 13, 2003 — but nowhere else.



This may sound crazy — particularly if you are still in the fading minority who still want to believe in a more-or-less benevolent government and media.

Nonetheless, two high-ranking military personnel — Nelda Rogers and Al Martin — risked their lives to get this story out.

US Tried to Plant WMDs in Iraq and Failed: Whistleblower

According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration’s assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to “plant” WMDs inside the country.

Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by “friendly fire”, the Environmentalists Against War report.

Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq.

According to Al Martin Raw.com, “Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense.”….

Ms Rogers reports that this particular covert operation team was manned by former military personnel and “the unit was paid through the Department of Agriculture in order to hide it, which is also very commonplace”.

According to Al Martin Raw.com, “the Agriculture Department has often been used as a paymaster on behalf of the CIA, DIA, NSA and others”.


As we read more of this astonishing article, we find out that 100 people were involved in this covert operation — and none of them survived.

US Tried to Plant WMDs in Iraq and Failed: Whistleblower

According to the Al Martin Raw.com story, another aspect of Ms Rogers’ report concerns a covert operation which was to locate the assets of Saddam Hussein and his family, including cash, gold bullion, jewelry and assorted valuable antiquities.

The problem became evident when “the operation in Iraq involved 100 people, all of whom apparently are now dead, having succumbed to so-called ‘friendly fire’.

“The scope of this operation included the penetration of the Central Bank of Iraq, other large commercial banks in Baghdad, the Iraqi National Museum and certain presidential palaces where monies and bullion were secreted.”

“They identified about $2 billion in cash, another $150 million in Euros, in physical banknotes, and about another $100 million in sundry foreign currencies ranging from Yen to British Pounds,” reports Al Martin.

“These people died, mostly in the same place in Baghdad, supposedly from a stray cruise missile or a combination of missiles and bombs that went astray,” Martin continues.

“There were supposedly 76 who died there and the other 24 died through a variety of ‘friendly fire’, ‘mistaken identity’ and some of them—their whereabouts are simply unknown.”…

“This was a contingent of CIA/ DoD operatives, but it was really the CIA that bungled it,” Ms Rogers said….

“CIA people were supposed to be handling it,” Martin continues.

“They had a special ‘black’ aircraft to fly [the stolen goods] out. But none of that happened because the regular US Army showed up, stumbled onto it and everyone involved had to scramble.”


It may well be that a hidden Pentagon alliance knew what this CIA team was there to do — and had to order them to be taken out for the greater good.

One of the consequences of this CIA operation was the Bush cartel came in possession of a massive glut of nearly worthless Iraqi dinars.

There is an astonishing amount of fairly well-written information online making people think they will make millions of dollars in a “currency revaluation” that increases the value of the dinar.

For ten years now, the classic “Tuesday-Friday Game” has been played. Always “the money is coming,” and when it’s not Tuesday, it bumps ahead to Friday, and so on, figuratively speaking.

My own journalism has often been co-opted by this group as well. Sadly, there are people who have refinanced their homes and dumped their life savings into dinars.

At least three different trusted insiders have told me this is a scam by the Bush cartel to monetize otherwise worthless paper — while also identifying people who “know too much.”

Here is one well-written expose of the dinar scam. To make the whole intrigue of this story even juicier, the expose’ is written by Mike Rothschild.

The insiders who told me this are brave, patriotic whistleblowers who claim to be part of a vast alliance working to defeat the Cabal.


Rothschild versus Bush may well be one of the most significant insider wars between opposing factions within the Cabal.

It is quite a mistake to think everyone in the Cabal agrees on who gets to be in charge. The only thing they agree on is secrecy.

There are multiple warring factions in the Cabal. The only thing they agree on is secrecy.

Hardly any of the dinar supporters are out there using their real names and identities in public. Always pseudonyms and Internet avatars.

Interestingly, the alleged insiders within the dinar group are also leaking a significant amount of real information about a global financial reset.

Dinars may go up in value to some degree — and many other currencies will as well. The overall effect should be extremely positive for everyone.

This is where the story gets a lot more interesting — sorting fact from fiction. We will discuss the truth behind the financial system change later in this investigation.

If some of the rumors I am hearing are true, then this might all happen a lot sooner than we think.


Stories of a group that is diabolical enough to plant fake WMDs in Iraq, as a pretext for World War III, are admittedly unpleasant to read.

Most people are trained to automatically discount stories of the Cabal, try to “debunk” them, poke holes in the credibility of the witnesses, et cetera.

You can certainly do that if you want to. The links are all there.

However, just as an exercise, let’s assume the overall concept is true. Let’s assume that this Cabal does indeed exist.

This can be a very, very disturbing reality to have to sit with and integrate into your normal, everyday life.

It’s a lot worse than what we now know about the NSA.

Nonetheless, if you are one of the 92 percent who believe in a greater intelligence that is loving, then some part of you knows this is all going to work out.


Even a die-hard rationalist might conclude that the only way this global adversary can keep going is if we remain ignorant of who it is and what it is doing.

Once we see and understand what is going on, a critical shift will occur in which it will be impossible for the “bad guys” to ever hurt us again.

That moment appears to be much closer than most people would ever think — and it will transform our world in ways few can even imagine.

We’ve had an amazingly effective villain in our global story — but once certain critical mistakes are made, the game is up. There’s no turning back.

Flight 370 is very likely the biggest “botched job” in the history of the Cabal.

And it happened while hundreds of millions of people are now paying attention.


Continues here

BLM – Tyranny of Taxation And Regulation Without Representation

In Activism, Alex Jones, Archive, China, News, NWO, Police State, UN, USA, USA, World Revolution on April 17, 2014 at 6:47 AM

April 17, 2014

The vilification of the Bundy family is in full force now by the mainstream media who are trying to paint Bundy as a law breaker, tax evader and label him as part of the Sovereign Citizen Movement, a hot button label that effectively puts a bounty on his head as a terrorist as far as law enforcement is concerned.

Iran vs. the Globalist New World Order: Is Rouhani the next Yanukovych?

In Archive, Illuminati, Iran, News, NWO, Russia, Ukraine on April 4, 2014 at 10:58 PM


(Update 2 – The IMF Invasion of Iraq & Russia plays the victim)

Are the P5+1 negotiations (chaired by a “royal,” Baroness Ashton)
really about Iran’s supposed nuclear program…

…or Iran’s assimilation into the globalist financial system?

The Globalist Takedown of Iran, by the numbers: First come sanctions…

The story of what’s going on today between the globalists and Iran can be traced back to June of 2010. Its genesis is reported in this passage from a McClatchy Newspapers article titled Obama administration unveils new Iran economic sanctions

“The Obama administration unveiled new measures Wednesday to isolate Iran commercially and financially from the rest of the world in hopes of convincing the Gulf nation to suspend its uranium enrichment program.

At a White House briefing, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner detailed new steps, targeting the banking, maritime and insurance sectors and follows last week’s United Nations Security Council decision to impose a new round of sanctions against Iran.

The European Union Thursday is expected to announce even tougher measures. News reports suggested leaders will announce bans on investment in Iran’s oil and natural gas sector, and technology transfer.

A European diplomat in Washington said the additional measures represent a new level of penalties on Iran. The diplomat asked not to be identified to speak freely.”

So under the pretext of trying to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the Globalist Troika of the US, UN, and EU set about destroying the Iranian economy. But they could not have done this without the collaboration of Russia and China, either of whom could have vetoed the UN Security Council Resolution that provided the public justification for the sanctions. Instead of protecting their supposed ally, though, both voted for the Resolution. As was stated by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton afterward in this Washington Post account

“‘We think that the sanctions send a kind of message to the entire Iranian leadership, which is quite diverse in their assessments and reactions, that there is still an opportunity for you to participate and to work with us,’ Clinton said after the 15-nation council adopted Resolution 1929 in 12-to-2 vote, with Brazil and Turkey casting no votes and Lebanon abstaining.”

Apologists for Russia, China, and Obama might make the claim that the Resolution was an effort to fend off more hawkish elements from attacking Iran militarily, but this does not reflect a policy conflict between “good guys” and “bad guys”; it reflects an internal difference of opinion within the Globalist Cabal between their more aggressive thinkers and their more pragmatic thinkers. The Zionist Neocon element of the globalists seems to want to take control of Iran by militarily rolling over them like they rolled over Iraq, but other globalist elements seem to think it’s more cost-effective and publicly palatable to seize Iran through soft power. But we’ll get back to that debate later in the entry.

Second comes economic misery and its effect on public opinion…

Moving forward to 2012, we find the globalists’ “engineered cash crunch begets IMF control” template was grinding down the Ahmadinejad government in Iran. According to this Bloomberg article

>>>Iran’s currency crisis will probably deepen the Islamic republic’s economic contraction this year by more than the International Monetary Fund had estimated, the fund’s Middle East chief said

The rial has tumbled about 40 percent against the dollar since August as the U.S. and the European Union starve the country of foreign currency by blocking sales of oil, its main export…

Iranian lawmakers will summon President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to question him about the plunge in the value of the currency, state-run Press TV reported Nov. 4. Ahmadinejad’s critics accuse him of mismanaging the economy

The government’s adoption of a “flexible exchange rate” needs to be supported by “tighter monetary policy and policy coordination to be able to contain the inflationary pressures that might come from it, and to ensure that there is an orderly foreign exchange market,” the IMF’s Ahmed said

Iran earned a rare praise from the lender after a two-year national debate to begin eliminating energy subsidies in December 2010 and replace them with cash payments. The currency crisis has prompted parliament to vote in favor of suspending the second stage of the plan, the state-run Mehr news agency reported today.<<<

In this passage, one can see eerie parallels between Iran and Ukraine. Like Ukraine, we see a major devaluation of Iran’s currency due to globalist attack measures. We see internal critics (some of whom are likely funded by the globalists) accusing the Iranian leader of “mismanagement of the economy” (the same charge that was leveled against the EU/IMF-resistant former government of Ukraine — and a rather disingenuous charge given that Ahmadinejad wasn’t the one crushing the Iranian economy with sanctions). We see the call from the IMF for Iran to adopt a “flexible exchange rate,” and we also see praise from the IMF for the government’s attempt to eliminate subsidies (eliminating subsidies and free-floating the currency are the two core things the IMF is demanding in Ukraine).

Reading this account makes one wonder if the economic sanctions and P5+1 negotiations are really about Iran’s nuclear program or about compelling Iran to make globalist/IMF “structural reforms.” But if the entire exercise is actually about the NWO’s assimilation of Iran, why are they pretending it’s about Iranian nukes? Because making it about nukes gives the globalists a built-in pretext for military invasion if soft-power approaches fail.

Third, the worn-down public opts for the seeming path of reconciliation…

Eager to end the international conflict and ease their economic suffering, the Iranian public decided to buy the globalists’ snake oil. They elected a “centrist” (globalist-friendly) candidate for Iranian President, Hassan Rouhani, and he took office on August 4, 2013. With their man elected and in place, the globalists moved quickly to back him up.

According to a Wall Street Journal account titled “Two-Track Negotiations Led to Iran Nuclear Deal” (you’ll have to copy and paste the headline into Google News search to read it)…

While U.S. officials secretly engaged Iran for years, the effort significantly ramped up in early August after the U.S. delivered Mr. Obama’s first letter to Iran’s new president, Hasan Rouhani. What followed was a handful of meetings in secret locations between the Iranians and the White House’s top point-men: Deputy Secretary of State William Burns; Jake Sullivan, Vice President Joe Biden’s top foreign-policy adviser; and the White House’s Iran expert, Puneet Talwar.”

In addition to the secret meetings with their newly elected agent regime, the globalists revitalized the public negotiations (the P5+1 Talks) which led to a temporary deal on Iran’s “nuclear program” and a partial easing of sanctions. The globalists did this to reward the Iranians for selecting their candidate and to give Rouhani some public momentum to aid him in implementing the structural changes they are seeking. But getting their reforms in place hasn’t gone as well as they had hoped.

Fourth, the government surrenders (or does it?)…

Moving forward to recent weeks, we find that Rouhani has had difficulty implementing the NWO structural changes, as is recounted in this Yahoo! News article titled Rouhani’s campaign of hope and change collides with Iran’s reality

>>>Six months into his presidency, Hassan Rouhani is struggling to placate supporters who are disappointed with the slow pace of reforms

“When Rouhani came to office, he did not understand at that time the problem in front of him,” says Sadegh Kharazi, a former ambassador who now directs the IRDiplomacy website and has family ties to Khamenei. “He wanted to reconstruct the Iranian economic system, industrial system, cultural system, educational system, service system, political system – everything“…<<<

I suspect that some of the supporters he has failed to placate are his NWO handlers, and that’s bad news for him. But let’s continue exploring why he’s had difficulty by noting the following passages from a World Politics Review article titled Iran’s Structural Constraints Limit Rouhani’s Domestic Agenda (you may have to copy and paste the title into Google News search to read the full article)…

“Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was elected in June 2013 on a ticket of change, amid hope for improvements in both domestic and foreign affairs. His constituents were, and still are, hoping for an easing of the political atmosphere, a less stifling environment on university campuses, a more predictable and stable style of governance and, most importantly, a reversal of the economic decline that has impoverished Iranians in the past 3-4 years…

Progress in those talks would entail the lifting of U.S. and European Union sanctions on Iran, which have exacerbated the problems of an already badly managed economy.

Yet the ability of Iranian presidents to affect the trajectory of foreign policy has often surpassed their ability to do the same in domestic matters. There are obvious structural reasons for this: The centers of power in Tehran are more concerned with domestic issues, according to which their political survival and fortunes are decided. This means Iranian powerbrokers’ willingness to act and take a stand in favor of or in opposition to government plans is much greater on domestic issues.

Then there are the institutional boundaries: The Ministry of Intelligence and the judiciary are not really under the authority of the elected president. The minister of intelligence is always appointed in direct consultation with the supreme leader, and the head of the judiciary, as well as the head of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, are appointed directly by the supreme leader himself. So the president may negotiate and cajole, and at times leverage his public mandate as the country’s highest elected official, but the institutions that can be used to discipline the citizenry and constrain public debate—or refrain from doing so—are not readily at his disposal.”

So it appears that the Iranian government has been structured in such a way that makes it resistant to infiltration and subversion, and that mitigates damage from the herding of public opinion by foreign wolf packs. The drafters of the Iranian Constitution were wise to do so.

Fifth, if at first you don’t succeed, keep dangling the carrot
(and start whipping your oarsmen)…

The slow and limited progress being made by Rouhani has resulted in frustration and open criticism by globalist organizations such as the IMF and UN. Consider the words and tone of this New York Times article titled I.M.F. Study Details Perils of Iranian Economy

>>>The International Monetary Fund issued a sobering appraisal of Iran’s economy on Wednesday, warning that years of government mismanagement aggravated by the impact of the West’s antinuclear sanctions had left the country vulnerable to anemic growth and rampant inflation that require urgent attention.

The I.M.F. appraisal was the organization’s first on-the-ground assessment of the Iranian economy in nearly three years. It was issued as Iran is seeking to undo the Western sanctions through negotiations on its disputed nuclear program…

Mr. Cerisola [Martin Cerisola, the I.M.F. assistant director for its Middle East and Central Asia department] said difficulties with the Iranian government’s attempts to reduce subsidies for fuel and food, inadequately funded social programs and “a marked deterioration in the external environment stemming from the intensification of trade and financial sanctions, have weakened the economy.”…

Mr. Cerisola, who led a delegation to Tehran from Jan. 25 to Feb. 8, said that the authorities in the administration of President Hassan Rouhani, which took over last summer, “are well aware of these challenges and the need to advance reforms, and have begun the preparatory work in many of these areas.”<<<

In this passage, we see the IMF expressing the “urgent” need for progress and specifically addressing the government failure to reduce subsidies for food and fuel to the people (a standard “reform” demand of the globalists which is also being pushed on Ukraine). It is quite humorous that they again blame “government mismanagement aggravated by the impact of the West’s antinuclear sanctions” for Iran’s struggles. Any rational person would reverse the order of that statement and conclude that it’s the impact of the sanctions aggravated by any government mismanagement that is the true source of their economic woes.

Also worth noting is the last paragraph, where the IMF representative says that authorities in Rouhani’s administration “are well aware of these challenges and the need to advance reforms, and have begun the preparatory work in many of these areas.” In stating this, he is essentially confirming the Rouhani administration’s collaboration with the globalists.

Nonetheless, the IMF assessment did predict mild growth (1-2%) for the Iranian economy, and the globalist propaganda line about the reasons for this growth (as well as recommendations to increase it) is offered in this Azernews article

>>>[Professor of economics at U.S. Northeastern University, Kamran] Dadkhah cited three reasons for the positive outlook depicted by the IMF.

“First, the United States and other countries have eased sanctions, and Iran has been allowed to access some of its blocked oil revenues. It is hoped that the nuclear negotiations would succeed and more sanctions are lifted. That would give a boost to the Iranian economy. Second, because of the new government’s expressed intention of coming to terms with the world, and improving the economic conditions, a positive attitude and hope of better future have been created among Iranians. Such expectations can help economic activity. Finally, the economic team of the new president seems to have the right ideas about the economy and have distanced themselves from populist ideas of the previous administration. Thus, it is not unreasonable to expect that the economy, after two years of decline, show improvement by 2015,” Dadkhah noted…

Meanwhile, Dadkhah said if the negotiations are successful and more sanctions are lifted, an increase can be expected in both Iran’s oil and non-oil exports.

“Of course, in addition to lifting of the sanctions, Iran has to do its best to attract foreign capital and technology. More important, the Iranian economy is in need of fundamental reforms. In particular, the economic activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) should be curtailed. Regarding international trade, Iran has to adopt a free floating exchange rate and make efforts to join the World Trade Organization,” Dadkhah said.<<<

In these passages, the professor speaks like a well-programmed globalist robot. Basically, he is saying that “coming to terms with the world” (surrendering to the globalists) will improve the Iranian economy, and that the Rouhani administration has the “right ideas” in pursuing IMF-style structural changes. When it comes to the subject of international trade, note how he points to the need for a “free floating exchange rate” (read my other IMF entries to see the significance of this) and for joining the globalists’ WTO. To sum it all up, he is saying that globalist assimilation is the key to Iranian economic improvement. He should tell that to the people of Greece and Ukraine.

If you meet the Buddha (or a “technocrat”) on the road, kill him

In exploring other press articles about how the Iranians can improve their lot by giving in, I came across a globalist codeword, “technocrat.” If you look into the IMF and the nations where they have been pushing through their social, political, and economic “reforms,” you’ll encounter that word over and over again. For those who are unfamiliar with the term, here is its real world definition…

technocrat – a professional agent of the Globalist NWO system tasked with implementing structural reforms in non-conforming nations.

In my Iran research, I encountered the “t” word first in this Iranian.com article

“And finally, the outcome of the normalization of relations with the US can potentially reshape Iranian society and result in the rise of technocrats through trade and commercial exchanges as well as Iranian citizens visiting America and vice versa. Technocrats, who by nature have a tendency toward western values rather than Islamic norms, may ultimately challenge the authority of the Iranian theocratic system and demand a share of power.”

The “t” word can also be found in connection to the Rouhani Administration in this Al-Monitor article

“Najafi [Mohammad-Ali Najafi, who was in charge of the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization of Iran] is a famous Reformist technocrat who was originally nominated as the minister of education by President Hassan Rouhani, but failed to receive a vote of confidence from the conservative-dominated parliament.”

It was no surprise to find a “technocrat” embedded in the Rouhani administration, and it is yet another clue that speaks to his true loyalties. Wherever technocrats show up in power, human misery soon follows.

The Iranian situation as it stands today….
Through the application of misery-inducing economic sanctions, covert political maneuvers, and propaganda efforts to sway Iranian public opinion, the globalists have managed to get an agent elected to one of the top posts in the Iranian government…

…Is he a card-carrying member of the Iranian equivalent of the Freemasons or Skull and Bones, or is he just another politician who has been compromised by money or sex? I cannot say, but he holds secret meetings with White House point men and his agenda comes straight out of the globalist playbook, so there can be little doubt which team he’s on.

Despite his assumption of power, the agent is making only limited progress in implementing the NWO “reforms” due to the resilient structure of the Iranian government, and this poses a danger for both him and Iran. In a recent article, I noted that the Russians have set a deadline of early 2015 for free-floating the ruble. Does this deadline extend to all the other nations as well? If it does, the hawks among the globalists might push aside their soft-power brothers and take more aggressive action to compel Iran’s compliance.

Given all this, it is important for the Iranian people to look to what happened in nations such as Cyprus, Greece, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, etc. and learn from those examples. No matter how bleak things might look at the moment, it will only get dramatically worse if the globalist horde gets through the gates. Do not fall for their siren song, because the sweet-sounding words they speak are lies, and the hopeful pictures they paint are illusions.

On that note, I’d like to point out the sweet-sounding ideas the globalists use to talk themselves through a nation’s door. They will come to you speaking of international friendship, economic prosperity, human rights, and the equality of women, and these are laudable ideals. But the globalist wolf uses these ideals as sheep’s clothing to get among your herd to start feeding upon you. And even the seemingly positive changes they bring about (such as ending the death penalty and giving women equality) carry within them hidden agendas that serve to tax and break down your society and sever the bonds of love that keep people fighting for each other’s wellbeing. Their only real agenda is to divide, control and bleed you dry, nothing more.

A globalist is a true-life vampire, and the smile he wears is a mask to cover his fangs…

…and courting his friendship carries the steepest of prices…

…Don’t fall for his bullsh*t.

In light of this and what we’ve witnessed in Operation Arab Spring and Operation Ukrainian New Dawn, consider this one final passage from a Reuters article titled Rouhani has not increased freedoms in Iran, U.N. chief says

>>>In a report to the U.N. Human Rights Council, Ban highlighted the prevalent use of capital punishment in Iran and called for the release of activists, lawyers and journalists as well as political prisoners that he said were in custody for exercising their rights to free speech and assembly.

“The new administration has not made any significant improvement in the promotion and protection of freedom of expression and opinion, despite pledges made by the president during his campaign and after his swearing in,” Ban said.

Both offline and online (news) outlets continue to face restrictions including closure,” he said.

Iranians expressing dissenting views or beliefs still face arrest and prosecution, he added.<<<

Repression exists in all countries to one degree or another, including the US (which also has the death penalty). It is worth noting, though, that when globalist opponents are arrested in the US, the mainstream news calls them “domestic terrorists,” and when globalist agents — those who serve the globalists either knowingly or unknowingly (by believing their deceptions and promoting their agendas) — are arrested by a resistant nation, they are called “political prisoners.” If you were Iran and had globalist agents running around trying to upend and enslave your nation, wouldn’t you round them up and put a stop to their activities?

As for the online and offline media restrictions, it is well known that the globalist intelligence services use social media to incite anger and lure people into the streets for color revolutions, and it is also well known that they subvert offline media like newspapers to spread their propaganda. In a soft-power siege like the globalists are laying on Iran, social media sites and newspapers are the command and control centers and missile launchers of the information war. It is only natural that the Iranian government would confront those threats.

It is important to remember (especially if you are an Iranian) that Iran is under massive assault by the “elite,” and the “conservative” elements of the Iranian government are doing what they must to protect their nation. As it turns out, the Revolutionary Guards might be holding the line for all of humanity right now. When I was a child, I remember laughing when I heard Ayatollah Khomeini call America “the Great Satan,” because the American people aren’t really like that. As it turns out, though, he was right all along. It’s not the American people who are laying sanctions on Iran; it’s the American federal government. And they are indeed a gang of actual devils.

In closing, I’d like say that we do need a united world, but God forbid it should ever happen under the current crop of parasitic globalist meddlers, thieves, deceivers, and murderers. With the surveillance and killing technology available today, a global government under their hierarchy would be very difficult to overturn, so it is better if we trip up their plans before they’re completed. But I’ll write more on this particular subject in another entry.

[Update 1 - 13 March 2014]

The IMF Invasion of Iraq

The US invasion of Iraq took place from 19 March 2003 to 1 May 2003. And in the midst of this assault, who was licking their chops and preparing to follow the soldiers in? The IMF, that’s who. Have a look at these screenshots from page 2 of the 21 April 2003 IMF Survey

…it continues…

Saddam Hussein had kept the IMF vultures out of his country since the early 80′s, but they found a way back in, didn’t they? And if you read between the lines of the document’s diplomatic parlance, they tell you exactly what they’re planning to do: go in after the invasion and take over the Iraqi economy. They are essentially admitting their role in the globalist system, which is to step in following a globalist-instigated conflict to mop up and consolidate control.

I’ve heard many narratives of why the US invaded Iraq, but globalist assimilation would seem to be the overriding reason.

[Update 2 - 13 March 2014]

Russia plays the victim

When I saw this article, I had to smile: Russia Bans Several Websites Critical of Gov’t

“Russia on Thursday banned several websites notable for their criticism of the government and a blog run by prominent opposition leader Alexei Navalny as the Kremlin intensified its crackdown on independent media amid tensions over Ukraine.

The government communications watchdog, Roskomnadzor, said Grani.ru, Kasparov.ru and Yezhednevny Zhurnal (Daily Journal) have carried incitements to unlawful behavior and participation in unauthorized mass gatherings.”

The day after I release my article supporting Iran’s defensive measures against a color revolution, I find Russia putting on a show about taking the same measures. From my perspective, this is propaganda to support the East versus West dialectic and the stage-managed “crisis” over Ukraine. When you weigh Russia’s open and enthusiastic cooperation with the G20/IMF in one hand, and this press release about shutting down a few websites in the other, the two don’t even compare. This is “cover your ass” damage control, IMHO.

Meanwhile, news reports of Congressional waffling over IMF quota reforms, the massing of Russian troops, the formulation of Western sanctions, and John Kerry’s Monday deadline are being fed to the public — and all this with less than a month left till the IMF meeting in Washington. It’s easy to see how these developments could morph into the dollar takedown narrative. I’m planning an Event Watch update tomorrow to cover this scenario.

Love always….

Oil, Gas & War; The ‘New World Order’ is already obsolete, while the making of another cold war beckons

In Archive, News, NWO, USA on March 29, 2014 at 8:15 AM

Vladimir Putin is no wimp. When he was challenged at Sochi with repeated terror attacks – so that he would not be able to hold his dream winter Olympics there – he fought the threat with an almost complete shutdown of the entire region and an equally ferocious fight back by his forces, unwilling to be cowed into submission before those who hoped to see his enterprise fail.

Refusing to acquiesce to the notion that his is a power that ‘has-been’, he instead heralded the arrival of Russia, once again, with an exemplary show of success and pomp at the Olympics. Russia was back – and it was no wimp.

Putin’s years at the helm have not been easy. Conscious of the pounding his nation had taken as the world reordered itself into a newer hierarchy, it seems his only mission has been to restore Russia back to its glory. His priority has been the recovery of a dead economy, while still retaining significant military capability – the second most powerful in the world. To recover the economy he would leverage his vast reserves of oil and gas. And that has virtually been the story of Russia’s efforts at resurrection to a position of geopolitical significance.

Russia has made gradual inroads into the new world order. It saw Nato’s original 16-nation membership grow to the now 28 – many republics of the old Warsaw Pact, and many who broke away from under the old Soviet nomenclature making the number. Russia itself joined Nato’s ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme. One cannot be more comprehensively vanquished.

But even as the world grew more comfortable with a seemingly more acquiescent Russia, the country began a relationship of interdependencies that now haunts most of Europe and (especially) the US. As the largest producer of gas in the world, Russia supplies 30 percent of all of Europe’s needs. Italy and Germany import most of their gas from Russia; a separate pipeline carries Russian gas directly into Germany. For a Europe that is barely struggling out of a long recession, this is a lifeline that it would never like to see hampered.

But then Ukraine happened. The order there under Viktor Yanukovych, a perceived Russian ally, was replaced by the west-supported party of Yulia Tymoshenko, Yanukovych’s nemesis. This is assumed to be America’s response to Putin’s resurgent assertiveness. Victoria Nuland, the US assistant secretary of state, said as much when she suggested that $5 billion had been spent on supporting the democratic movement in Ukraine.

Ukraine is Russia’s ‘near abroad’ – a group of 14 nations that took birth from within the Soviet Union and now populate the Baltics, the Caucasus, Central Asia and Eastern Europe. Vladimir Putin declared the region Russia’s “sphere of influence” and called it strategically vital for Russia. Between George Bush and him, it simply meant ‘hands-off’, and Bush largely respected that. To him, perhaps, finding consensus on START III was more important than to ruffle Russian feathers.

Under Obama, however, things have been different, though he too got his follow-up to Bush’s START by signing the New START with Russia’s Medvadev in 2010. What really changed, however ,was the discovery of gas by fracking shale rock which has excited a lot of imagination in the US.

One, the US declared itself sufficient in gas needs and cancelled its purchases from Qatar; plans to import oil from Canada, courtesy another breakthrough technology, extraction from oil sands, were also put on hold. At the same type, current plans envisage ‘liquification’ of shale gas for export purposes. The US Congress is currently reviewing laws that will enable the US to export their new find. Two things, therefore, needed to happen simultaneously; Europe was to be encouraged to give up on Russian gas, and instead source it from the US. Two, the US continues to entice Europe to also unbind their hidden reserves of gas from shale – Poland, a former Soviet client, is particularly under focus to import fracking from the US as the new technology tool for Europe.

Events in Ukraine have enabled such events. Russia was forced to secure its most important asset – its only access to a warm water port in Sevastopol, Crimea. It is popularly believed that Ukraine just might split down the middle into two halves, the Russian-speaking eastern half, and the western Ukrainian-speaking half that will become the newer addition to the western sphere of influence. Even more crucially, thee of the pipelines carrying Russia’s gas to Europe ply through Ukraine, while Ukraine itself owes billions to Russia for the gas that it has availed and used.

This has major geopolitical implications. Freed from any Russian encumbrances, Europe could now begin to regain its polar affiliation with the US. That will isolate Russia, not only denting its revenues but also denying it the favour of an important interdependency that diluted Europe’s anti-Russia leanings. Paradoxically, it will slow down any recovery, while making it difficult for the better performing economies to keep their momentum.

Europe remains wary of shale gas and will perhaps remain equally shy of importing from the US unsure of the real volumes in stock available with the US. This is a complication the Americans will still need to work through as they play their newest geopolitical hand.

Russia has also announced two 1100MW nuclear reactors each for Turkey and Iran. A pipeline from Russia to Europe is routed via Turkey. Russia has now begun to interact closely with Afghanistan. A new government with Northern Alliance origins will enable Russia to garner even greater influence with Afghanistan. Russia will secure its southern underbelly by a more aggressive and positive engagement with both Iran and Afghanistan in the weeks ahead.

Russian overtures to Pakistan to seek a broad-based rejuvenation in the relationship ties into a strongly developing notion of a stronger regional framework in political and economic domains. Russia is already working on a gas pipeline to China and whatever it may lose in Europe is likely to be compensated by China. The icing on this remaking of yet another global order is the removal of Russia from the G-8.

A new divide defines this newer global order. While the west consolidates it is forcing the east to coalesce. The ‘new world order’ is already obsolete, while the making of another cold war beckons. These are no ordinary tremors. And the bear is just about reawakening. Interesting times lie ahead but nations who keep their interests supreme will end up making the right choices.

The writer is a retired air-vice marshal of the Pakistan Air Force and served as its deputy chief of staff.

Email: shhzdchdhry@yahoo.com

Why World War III Will Begin In Syria

In News, NWO, USA on March 28, 2014 at 11:51 AM

russian military

Dave Hodges March 28, 2014 The Common Sense Show

It is possible to make a reasonable prediction about where World War III will break out based upon historical Russian military strategy. Putin is following a very predictable pattern that dates back to over a 100 years of Russian military history coupled with the present set of events.

The Present Situation

Russia is bleeding the Petrodollar dry by leading the BRIC nations in the purchase of Iranian oil for gold. The same situation is emerging in Europe as Russia is on the verge, either by invasion or by proxy control of Ukraine, of controlling a good portion of energy needs to Europe and being able to bypass the Petrodollar as a means of payment for Russian energy shipments into Europe. Further, Russia has just completed a deal which brings China into the Russian energy sphere of influence. This will eventually culminate in the weakening of NATO and the isolation of the United States both economically and militarily. What does Russia want and what will be its eventual goal? Some believe that Russia wants to occupy the United States and perhaps Putin eventually does, but it is not practical at this particular point of time. Economic attrition and military isolation are Putin’s best friends at this time. After all, the US is in possession of over 2,000 nuclear weapons and 72 nuclear armed submarines which are virtually undetectable. Despite the presence of these American deterrents, do not be lulled into a false sense of security, this cold war will soon turn hot.

Putin’s Military Strategy

russian arctic oil and gas fieldsPutin is pursuing a military strategy that most Americans have never heard of and even fewer understand and it has to do with Russia’s geographic makeup and this holds the key to Russian military strategy Although Russia possesses one of the largest land masses in the world, they possess an abhorrent lack of useable coastline. Historically, Russian economic growth has been severely impeded because of the lack of usable ports. Russia rues the day that they sold Alaska to the United States. It also helps to explain why Syria has jumped to the forefront of world affairs. Russia is sitting on vast energy deposits and they are threatening to expand their energy based and mineral world dominance by exploiting the newly discovered riches at the North Pole and they have invested significant resources in beefing up their Arctic fighting forces towards this end. Russia may be able to acquire vast mineral resources, but without significant ports from which to trade, the Russian economy will always run in second gear. One does not need to have access to Putin’s war plans to understand what is going on, one needs to only be a student of history in order to predict where this coming conflict is headed.

The Heartland Theory

British geographer and military historian, Sir Halford MacKinder, in 1904, wrote an article that changed how politicians and military men viewed the world. The theory that had so influenced nearly five generations of strategists was called simply, the Heartland Theory. Basically, Mackinder’s Heartland Theory views geo-political military history as a struggle between land-based and sea-based powers. Mackinder believed the world had become a “closed” system, with virtually no new lands left for the Europeans powers to discover, to conquer, and to fight over without creating chaos elsewhere. According to the theory, the common denominator for world conflict has been reduced to sea powers vs. land-based powers which would subsequently struggle for dominance of the world, and the ultimate victor would be in a position to set up a world empire. The determining factor in this struggle was physical geography; “Man and not nature initiates, but nature in large measure controls”.

From Mackinder’s perspective, Soviet Russia had to be contained within the heartland. Mackinder’s believed that whosoever controlled Eurasia, controlled the world, so long as the controller had access to useable ports. The problem for Russia is that they have so few usable ports thus impacting commerce and the movement of men and material in a time of war. So long as Russia could be prevented from being a major sea power, the forces of the United States and Western Europe were safe. However, if Russia should become a sea power in conjunction with its massive land-based power, Russia could rule the world. And now, through the release of Russian secret documents we are finding out that Stalin was willing to fight a war with the US over obtaining Alaska seaports as predicted by the Heartland Theory.

Stalin’s Secret Plans to Invade Alaska In 1951

stalinIn 1999, at a conference held at Yale University, previously-secret Russian documents revealed that Russian Dictator Joseph Stalin had undergone extensive planning in preparation to invade North America as early as 1951. The event was one of a series of programs sponsored by the Washington D.C.-based Cold War International History Project (CWIHP), which monitors new documents pertaining to the Cold War. The Yale conference centered on Stalin’s relationship with the United States. These documents, from the Cold War, revealed that Stalin had a definitive plan to attack Alaska in 1951-52 and had undergone major military preparations in anticipation of the invasion. Russia has always considered itself to be landlocked and this served as the major motivation for Russia’s planned incursion which would have given Russia access to good sea ports. Stalin subsequently died and the plans were abandoned, at least temporarily, mostly due to American dominance in nuclear weapons. In 2014, we see the importance of Heartland Theory in guiding Russian foreign policy with regard to Syria and to some degree, China. The Chinese-Russian energy deal allows Russia access to Chinese ports. Russia is steadfast in its protection of Syria because of the Russian need to use the ports of Tartus and Aleppo. And it is highly likely that once the energy pipelines in Ukraine are secured by Putin, Europe will soon be making seaport concessions to Russia in exchange for Russian based energy shipments. At the beginning of the crisis in Crimea, the first objective of the Russian military was to secure the naval base in Sevastopol. The Russians desire the fleet to grow in support a new Mediterranean task force created by Russia last year as move to counter an increase US naval presence in the Mediterranean. If Ukraine had been allowed to be wooed by Western banksters to join the European Union, Russia’s most important naval force would have been effectively neutered because of the potential loss of Sevastopol as a naval base. The G7 nations may view Putin’s actions in Crimea as being offensive, Putin, no doubt, views the action as a matter of military survival. Again, the Heartland Theory comes into play. The Heartland Theory also came into play during last year’s Syrian crisis as Putin threatened to nuke the United States if it invaded Syria in violation of international law. Syria is critical to the Russians on a number of fronts including the prevalence of Syria’s warm water ports. Syria’s importance to Russia can be condensed to five essential factors: 1. Russia has a naval installation in Syria. The base is vitally important because it is Russia’s last foreign military base outside of the former Soviet Union. Putin is playing a bit of a slight of hand approach by stating they are closing the facility. However, the Russians are maintaining navy technicians and to service their permanent flotilla in the area. 2. Russia utilizes the port at Aleppo and Tartus to facilitate is sea trade. 3. Fortifying Syria provides protection for Iran who is undermining the Petrodollar by selling its oil for gold. This allows Putin to be engaged in an economic war against the dollar the Federal Reserve. 4. Syria is a military satellite of Russia as Assad continues to buy a high quantity of  Russian military exports, which aids the Russian economy.

America’s Options

Control of Ukraine and its gas shipments through the country are the key to swinging the balance of power on the planet. If Ukraine comes under the complete control of the Russians, energy blackmail and the eventual disintegration of NATO will occur. If Russia moves to take over Ukraine, what options does the United States have? It is not likely that at this point in time that NATO has the ability to keep Russia out of Ukraine. Where is Russia most vulnerable? The clear answer is in Syria. Syria has both economic and military significance to Russia. If Syria were to fall to the United States, the military and economic loss would be catastrophic, not the least, would be the loss of Syrian ports. Russia’s prudent course of action would be to continue to erode the US economy by its relentless attacks upon the Federal Reserve and the Petrodollar. However I do not foresee the Federal Reserve banksters are going to continue to let this happen as the dollar erodes. Subsequently, when Ukraine falls, Syria and possibly Iran will be attacked by the United States. The provocation will likely be a false flag event within the United States in which the Syrians are falsely implicated. Remember the Heartland Theory, it also predict the second front of the coming World War III. Along these lines, Putin will attack Alaska if the United States attacks Syria. This is how a cold war can turn hot in a hurry. If you do not believe me, just ask the Polish as they have begun mobilizing for war. DHS just began a martial law lock down drill yesterday which will last for nearly a month. Ask yourself, what do these people know that you do not? Again, I want to caution people to stock up on supplies. If a false flag event does occur, your ability to resupply could be seriously imperiled.

%d bloggers like this: